Paweł Fortuna

• Advised Redefine in the proceedings that resulted in obtaining unconditional clearance from UOKiK for the client's acquisition of control of a leading commercial real estate company.˚
• Advised BASF and Sinopec in the proceedings that resulted in obtaining unconditional clearance from UOKiK for the creation of a joint venture to build a chemical plant.˚
• Advised Porsche in the proceedings that resulted in obtaining unconditional clearance from UOKiK for the creation of a joint venture to develop and market software based on artificial intelligence for use in the automotive sector.˚
• Advised Hydro Rein and Macquarie in the proceedings that resulted in obtaining unconditional clearance from UOKiK for the creation of a joint venture to build onshore wind and photovoltaic projects.˚
• Advised CEE and Nala in the proceedings concluded with obtaining unconditional clearance from UOKiK for the creation of a joint venture to implement and operate an energy storage project.˚
• Advised 7R in the proceedings concluded with obtaining unconditional clearance from UOKiK for the creation of a joint venture to carry out an investment involving the construction of warehouses.˚
• Advised the EPP in the proceedings concluded with obtaining the unconditional clearance of UOKiK in a precedent-setting case confirming that a concentration within the meaning of Polish merger control regulations is the return of leased property to its owner after the expiry of lease agreements concluded with a third party.˚
• Advised CHG-Meridian in the proceedings concluded with obtaining unconditional clearance from UOKiK for the acquisition of joint control over a leading provider of support services to IT companies.˚
• Advised Develia in the proceedings resulting in obtaining unconditional clearance from UOKiK for the creation of a joint venture with I Asset Management UAB to implement an investment project involving the construction of a collective residence building with a service function. ˚
• Advised Arkema and Nippon in the proceedings that resulted in obtaining unconditional clearance from UOKiK for the creation of a joint venture to build a plant to produce a key component of battery cells for electric vehicles.˚
• Advised an international coffee shop chain on antitrust aspects of the transaction and supported the client during the second phase of the merger control proceedings before UOKiK.˚
• Advised Air Products on reporting the implementation of the condition imposed in the decision of UOKiK and obtaining an extension of the deadline for its implementation.˚
• Advised a multinational beverage manufacturer on potential antitrust risks associated with an asset sale to an entity with which it had implemented a concentration in the previous year.˚
• Advised a global metal packaging manufacturer on the sale of part of its manufacturing business, particularly on the structuring of the interim period clauses in the asset purchase agreement .˚
• Advised a multinational group operating in the utilities sector in structuring transactions to minimize merger control risks.˚

• Advised a global technology solutions provider in preparing an appeal against a decision of UOKiK fining a client in a precedent-setting case for obstructing a dawn raid conducted at the company's headquarters, as well as an appeal against a decision imposing a multi-million fine on the client and a high fine on a company’s manager .˚
• Advised a supplier in the technology sector in the preparation and submission of a leniency application (request for waiver or reduction of a fine) to UOKiK on behalf of a client in relation to resale price maintenance and market sharing.˚
• Advised a multinational manufacturer in the machinery industry in conducting an internal audit to verify allegations of antitrust violations by the client's employees, prepared the audit report and advised on strategic steps in relation to the findings.˚
• Supported a multinational manufacturer in the machinery industry during a several-day dawn raid of the company's premises and represented the client in the complaint proceedings against the search measures before the court.˚
• Advised an international manufacturer in the agricultural industry on shaping its distribution system in accordance with competition law.˚
• Advised an international automotive component manufacturer in structuring the provisions of its supply agreements, including exclusivity, in compliance with competition law.˚
• Developed guidelines for the management, reception, and IT department of an international beverage manufacturer on how to proceed in the event of UOKiK’s inspection or search.˚

• Advised a global manufacturer of sportswear and footwear on the client's compliance with consumer law, in particular regarding the complaints procedure and information obligations.˚
• Advised an international bank on the assessment of contract templates from a consumer law perspective.˚
• Advised an international chain of athletic footwear shops on displaying prices in accordance with consumer law in connection with Trade Inspection controls carried out at the client’s shops.˚
• Advised a global e-commerce platform on changes resulting from the latest EU consumer law regulations.˚

˚The above representations were handled by Paweł Fortuna prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig Nowakowska-Zimoch Wysokiński sp.k.

• Member, Warsaw Bar Association
• Polish Competition Law Association