New surveillance technologies pose Fourth Amendment privacy challenges, as seen in United States v. Moore-Bush, where opinions differed on whether prolonged pole camera surveillance constitutes a Fourth Amendment “search.” This debate reflects a broader concern over privacy invasion and pervasive surveillance, echoing issues from Carpenter v. United States. Read the University of Miami Law Review article titled, “Whose House is it Anyway? Police Technology and Fourth Amendment Privacy,” by Andrew de la Osa.
LINK
Click here to read “Whose House is it Anyway? Police Technology and Fourth Amendment Privacy".