Joshua L. Raskin

Joshua L. Raskin

Shareholder

Joshua L. Raskin is Chair of the New York Intellectual Property & Technology Group and a registered patent attorney. Josh’s primary focus is on patent litigation, although he has wide-ranging experience in all areas of IP. He has litigated countless cases in federal courts across the country and has argued several times before the Courts of Appeals for the Federal and Second Circuits. He has represented clients at the trial and appellate stages in a broad range of industries, including electronics, computer technology, mobile handsets, medical devices and products, and finance.

His experience is broad and varied having represented both defendants and plaintiffs. Prior to joining the firm, Josh was the head of the patent litigation practice at a prominent New York plaintiffs’ firm where he oversaw numerous complex patent cases. Before that, Josh was a partner and co-head of the patent litigation practice at a national firm where he represented both plaintiffs and defendants in cases involving all areas of intellectual property, including patents, trademarks and copyrights.

Josh also has deep experience with inter partes review proceedings, including representing companies such as Samsung, B. Braun Medical, and Stingray Music. Outside of the new post-grant review processes, Josh has also worked on numerous U.S. patent reexaminations (both inter partes and ex parte).

Concentrations

  • Patent infringement
  • Post-issuance patent proceedings, including inter partes review, post-grant review and ex parte reexaminations
  • Intellectual property counseling, licensing, due diligence and opinions
  • Trademark infringement
Mehr +

Expertise

Erfahrung


  • Product Association Technologies LLC ShopStyle, Inc., 1-17-cv-00978 (D. Del. 2017) – Represented ShopStyle in patent litigation involving Internet database technology.
  • Music Choice v. Stingray Digital Group Inc. and Stingray Music USA, Inc., 2-16-cv-00586 (E.D. Tex. 2017) – Representing Stingray in a patent infringement concerning patents related to the distribution of audio and video content.
  • Garmin Switzerland GMBH, and Garmin Corporation v. Navico, Inc., 16-cv-2706 (D. Kan. 2017) – Representing the defendants in a patent infringement case involving marine route navigation technology.
  • American Needle, Inc. v. CafePress Inc., 15-cv-03968 (N.D. Ill. 2016) – Represented CafePress in patent litigation regarding graphical user interface technology.
  • FlatWorld Interactives LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd, et al., 12-cv-00804 (D. Del.) – Represented the defendant in patent litigation regarding software for removing images from a touch screen.
  • B.E. Technology v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., 12-cv-02825 (W.D. Tenn.) – Represented the defendant in patent litigation regarding technology for storing user profiles and user libraries of files on servers and accessing them on a client device.
  • Digital Audio Encoding Systems, LLC v. eBay Inc., 1-16-cv-00491 ( Del. 2016); Digital Audio Encoding Systems, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc., 1-16-cv-00562 (D. Del. 2016) – Represented eBay and LG in patent litigation involving technology relating to the encoding of signals based on a property of the receiving device .
  • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., 14-cv-00883 (E.D. Tex. 2016) – Represented the defendant in patent litigation regarding technology for two-way wireless communications, including methods and devices for processing data messages between a mobile unit and a network operations center, delivery notification technology.
  • Guyzar LLC v. Ebates, Inc., 15-cv-02000 (E.D. Tex. 2015) – Represented Ebates in patent litigation regarding Internet third party login technologies.
  • Blue Spike, LLC v. 3M Cogent, Inc., 12-cv-499 (E.D. Tex. 2014) – Represented the defendant in patent litigation regarding digital watermarking technology.
  • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, 13-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex.) – Represented the defendant in patent litigation regarding technology for two-way wireless communications, including methods and devices for processing data messages between a mobile unit and a network operations center.
  • Cellport Systems, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., 13-cv-00180 (D. Colo. 2013) – Represented defendant in patent litigation regarding technology for selecting one of a plurality of communication channels over which to transmit data using a wireless device.
  • Data Speed Technology, LLC v. Blackboard Inc., 13-cv-1445 (D. Del. 2013) – Represented the defendant in patent litigation regarding computer information storage systems.
  • Eclipse IP LLC v. CafePress, Inc., 13-cv-01711 (D. Del. 2013) – Represented the defendant in a patent litigation regarding electronic messaging, notification and authentication systems.
  • Bluebonnet Telecommunications LLC v. Samsung Electronics America Inc., et al., 12-cv-504 (E.D. Tex.) – Represented the defendants in a patent litigation regarding mobile device features allowing a user to determine whether certain telephony features are active, deactivate certain features and silence the ringer.
  • Cinsay, Inc. v. Liveclicker, Inc., 13-cv-04126 (N.D. Tex. 2013) – Represented the defendant in a patent litigation regarding interactive text/advertisement overlays over videos.
  • Express Card Systems LLC v. CafePress Inc., 13-cv-137 (E.D. Tex. 2013); Express Card Systems LLC v. Target Corp., 13-cv-00020 (E.D. Tex. 2013) – Represented the defendants in patent litigation regarding systems for creating customized greeting cards.
  • ORG Structure Innovations, LLC v. Fischer International Identity, LLC, 12-cv-01464-SLR (D. Del. 2013) – Represented the defendant in patent litigation regarding computer software.
  • Anvik Corporation v. Nikon Precision, Inc., et al., 05-cv-7891 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) – Represented the plaintiff in patent litigation relating to lithography methods used to expose glass panels used in the fabrication of LCD panels.
  • Williamson, on Behalf of and as Trustee for At Home Bondholders’ Liquidating Trust v. Verizon Communications Inc., et al., 11-cv-04948 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) – Represented the plaintiff in patent litigation relating to internet protocol television systems.
  • IpLearn, LLC v. Blackboard Inc., 11-cv-00876 (D. Del. 2011) – Represented the defendant in patent litigation regarding computer-aided learning systems.
  • Xpoint Technologies, Inc. v. Intel Corporation, et al., 09-cv-0026 (D. Del. 2011). – Represented the plaintiff in patent litigation relating to computer backup and restore technology.
  • Xpoint Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, et al., 09-CV-0628 (D. Del. 2009) – Represented the plaintiff in patent litigation relating to Peer I/O technology.
  • IGT v. Las Vegas Gaming, Inc., 07-cv-00415 (D. Nev. 2008) – Represented the defendant in a complex copyright/trademark infringement case concerning audiovisual display of electronic gaming machines.
  • Regal Electronics Inc. v. Bel Fuse, Inc., et al., 03-cv-01296 (N.D. Cal. 2007) – Represented the defendant in a patent litigation regarding high speed data connectors.
  • Blazer v. eBay, Inc., 1:15-cv-01059 (N.D. Ala. 2015) – Represented eBay in a patent litigation relating to wooden carpenter bee traps.
  • USB Technologies, LLC v. eBay Inc., et al., 2:15-cv-04836 (C.D. Cal. 2015) – Represented eBay in patent litigation regarding lighting to USB flash drive products.
  • Carson Optical, Inc. v. eBay Inc., 2:2015-cv-03793 (E.D.N.Y. 2015) – Representing eBay in patent litigation regarding head magnifying glasses and head belts for head magnifying glasses.
  • Braun Melsungen AG, et al. v. Becton, Dickinson and Company, et al., 1:16-cv-00411 (D. Del. 2017) – Representing B. Braun in a litigation involving infringement by Becton, Dickinson and Company of 10 patents generally relating to IV catheter safety systems.
  • CAO Group, Inc. v. Biolase Technology, Inc. – Representing Biolase in patent litigation regarding laser-driven medical devices.
  • Laclede Professional Products Inc. v. Sultan Dental Products, Ltd., 98-cv-981 (C.D. Cal.) – Represented the defendant in a patent infringement case involving dental fluoride foams.
  • CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC v. 3M Company; CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC v. Charles Schwab & Co, Inc.; CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC v. optionsXpress, Inc., 15-cv-1284 (E.D. Tex. 2015) – Represented 3M Company, Charles Schwab and optionsXpress in connection with a patent suit initiated by CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC in the Eastern District of Texas before Judge Schroeder. The asserted patent generally relates to securely generating public and private encryption keys in a verifiable manner. Settled with plaintiff on terms very favorable to clients.
  • Ruby Sands LLC v. Charles Schwab Corp.; Ruby Sands LLC v. Fidelity Investments, 15-cv-01985 (E.D. Tex. 2015) – Represented Charles Schwab and Fidelity in litigations in the Eastern District of Texas before Judge Gilstrap. The asserted patent related to the capture and transfer of images from one image transfer device to another.  Settled with plaintiff on terms very favorable to clients.
  • EMG Technology, LLC v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, 14-cv-00094-MHS (E.D. Tex. 2014) –  Represented Northwestern Mutual in litigation in the Eastern District of Texas before Judge Schneider. The asserted patent related to a system for navigating the Internet that converts standard HTML website pages to a “sister site” that enables the HTML website content to be navigated using a “simplified navigation system.” GT was successful in getting plaintiff to dismiss the case with prejudice.
  • Leveraged Innovations, LLC. v. NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., et al., 11-cv-3203 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) – Represented the plaintiff in patent litigation in the Southern District of New York relating to computer systems for creating and exchanging of shares of leveraged exchange-traded funds.
  • Becton Dickinson and Company v. B. Braun Melsungen AG (IPR2017-01587) – Representing patent owner in IPR proceedings related to patents covering IV catheter safety systems.
  • Stingray Digital Group Inc., et al v. Music Choice (IPR2018-00114) – Representing petitioner in IPR proceedings related to patents covering the distribution of digital music.
  • Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. B.E. Technology, LLC (IPR2014-00044) – Represented petitioner in IPR proceedings related to patents related to storing user profiles and user libraries of files on servers and accessing them on a client device

°Certain of the above representations were handled by Mr. Raskin prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.

Anerkennung durch den Markt

  • Listed, Managing IP Magazine's World IP Handbook and Survey, "IP Stars," 2014-2018
  • Listed, IAM magazine, "IAM Patent 1000," Litigation, 2014-2018

Ausbildung

Akademische Ausbildung
  • J.D., Brooklyn Law School, 1996
  • B.S.E., Industrial Engineering, University of Michigan, 1993
Zulassung
  • New York
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Sprache