Neuroethics is rapidly emerging as a critical but underdeveloped field in law and policy, leaving the legal profession unprepared for the fast-moving rise of neural data collection, fragmented state regulation, and the coming challenges of neurotechnology across privacy, employment, IP and constitutional law.
Early in April I returned from the Asilomar Conference Grounds in Pacific Grove, California, where I served as an invited delegate to Asilomar for the Brain and Mind 2026--a convening organized by BrainMind that brought neuroscientists, ethicists, investors, clinicians and lawyers together to build governance infrastructure for neurotechnology. I participated in two working groups charged with drafting practical tools--pre-investment due diligence standards and neural data go...
LINKS
Read “Your Brain Data Is Already Being Collected. The Law Has Not Caught Up.” authored by John Wehrli and published in the Daily Journal. (subscription)